Here’s to you HP Touchpad

The (self-given) gift that keeps on giving?

Once upon a time, I brought home a shiny, almost-firesale-priced 16GB HP Touchpad, with the desire to get in on the tablet game and, hopefully, have a useful media-consumption device that anybody in the family could use.  I went through a WebOS phase, believing that it Kept It Simple Stupid(tm) while also allowing functionality approximating that of a true multi-user implementation.  And indeed, the little-tablet-that-could saw its fair share of Castle and Young and the Resless (the former for me, the latter for the significant other).

And as support waned for WebOS, I tinkered with Android – and Android eventually preempted WebOS, the latter of which saw its use decline drastically once an issue popped up that made it inconvenient to apply community homebrew patches and updates.

But the device soldiered on, and it continued to be a media-consumption device – although my heart-of-hearts still yearned for a true multi-user solution, particularly one that would allow me to move seamlessly between my personal Android phone and the Android tablet.

Said Android version was pegged at 4.0 for  many months, until the plunge was made to install 4.1 – if only to gain some speed and newness, if not multi-user capability.  Ultimately 4.2 was the goal, and with it the realization of true multi-user support.

Meanwhile, other factors conspired to reduce the Touchpad’s daily handling; it became more relegated to spending its days basking in the electric warmth of its Touchstone charging base.  The onslaught of Plex and Roku spelled the introduction of have-it-your-way TV consumption, enabling dead-simple large-screen (and small-screen) viewing as well as the ability to resume playback across multiple devices.  But even Plex and Roku had to play second-fiddle to the ever-increasing demands of two active and highly-inquisitive young boys.

So what of the Touchpad today, and the myth of one needing a tablet?

Well… I’ve never believed that one needs a tablet, but I’ve always believed that there is real utility in the device.  And despite the explosion in phone screen sizes in the past year – such that even yours truly will likely go 5″+ on my next phone upgrade – my experience with the Touchpad has spoiled me.  When at home, there is simply no doubt in my mind that a larger tablet can offer a more immersive, more productive and rewarding experience than a smartphone.  And to substantiate that claim, I recently played with a Nexus 7 for the second time in my life, except this time I came away thinking that nothing short of a 10″ display (or perhaps 8″…) makes any sense.  The Nexus 7 quite literally felt like a phone – and worse yet, one with a horribly-large bezel.

(can I just say that there are way too many hyphens in this post…)

What I like about the Touchpad – and probably any other 10″ tablet – is that it is big.  And again, given that my idea of the ideal tablet use-case is for media consumption in the home, mobility does not enter the equation.  Would a 12″ tablet be better?  Perhaps, but a 10″ is Good Enough(tm) while a 7″ – in my mind – is Too Little, Too Late(tm).

So with the kids in bed and Plex/Roku beckoning, what sort of media consumption can a tablet really provide in my household?

Not a difficult question to answer – the portable kind.  But more importantly, there’s enough of an overlap between a tablet and smartphone – in concept and software – that all of the things I use my smartphone for at home can easily be done on the tablet, and with a larger screen to boot.  The benefits are twofold; again, the larger screen – and critically, the abundant battery that doesn’t need to be sufficiently charged if I need to go on the road for some unknown reason.

Basically, I can put down the phone (or more likely, slip it in my pocket) and do everything on the tablet instead.  My digital existence is “in the cloud” (both private and public), and the holdouts are being likewise relegated.  This allows choice – and boy do I love Choice(tm) – with the decision being completely dependent on which device I feel like using rather than what tasks I want to perform.

This is what multi-user enables.  I am the only person who uses my phone, but the tablet is intended for anybody in the family.  Even if WebOS had a wicked-awesome Plex client, the card-stacking metaphor that I invented previously would not allow for the seamless shift between personal smartphone and family tablet… when it came time to access my digital existence.

Sooooo…. more than a year after being welcomed into my home, the trusty old Touchpad is finally starting to fulfill its destiny.  It’s now sporting an alpha 4.2 ROM – and with it, true multi-user capability.  It’s a liberating experience; yesterday evening, my smartphone was at 99% charge by bedtime simply because it had been on the charging pad all evening, yet I read more Pocket(tm)’d articles, flipped through more Distro mags and trundled through more videos in my Youtube subscriptions than on any evening in recent memory.  And in a counter-intuitive twist, I fully expect that that level of consumption will not continue; not because the “fad” will wear off, but rather, because there are no barriers to getting that stuff done.  There are no battery concerns, there’s no weird logging-in to be done (aside from selecting my user profile on the lockscreen and unlocking with my preferred security method).  There’s no pressure; there’s just this relaxing knowledge that the decision to do that stuff is based solely on Time and Desire; once those technology-unladen conditions are met, I can wash dishes and watch Top Shelf, or lean against a wall and thumb through mail, or recline on the couch and catch The Daily Show.

Or I can defer to another day or time, knowing how easy the decision will be to choose the Right Device(tm) for the Right Time(tm).


Does Google really have tablet woes?

There seems to be much discussion concerning Google and its apparent failure in the tablet market.  If I understand, the suggestion is that Google has failed to execute correctly; it simply hasn’t put enough effort into pushing the idea of an Android tablet so much as it has pushed the idea of Android mobile devices. The Nexus 7 is widely regarded as Google’s first (and only) success in the tablet space, despite being preceded by a number of retail devices and one major OS revision.

And it would seem that time isn’t on Google’s side either, what with the impending release of Microsoft’s Windows 8 RT tablets.  Microsoft has been courting the tablet space for a number of years now, and their inability to make deep inroads was as much due to Windows itself as it was to a lackluster consumer demand.

But with Apple proving that tablets are now in demand, and Microsoft having an established user base on the desktop that seems primed to jump into mobile, is Google destined to be a distant third in the tablet space?  Have they gotten it wrong while Apple has run with the crown and Microsoft has finally gotten it right

I think there’s more at play here.  I’ve talked about it here, and others have talked about it too – that is, the question of whether people really need a tablet.  Tablets have – and still do – sit somewhere between the uber-personal smartphone and the uber-productive laptop/desktop.  They’re an interesting media consumption device, and Apple successfully capitalized on its existing media ecosystem by introducing another client that was less personal, less presumptuous and more convenient than the existing alternatives.

And yet we’re seeing a shift in the tablet space.  Like it or not, tablets are approaching the smartphone in size and – crucially – in importance.  They’re becoming more personal.  The shift from 10″ to 7″ has obvious implications re: productivity, and the combination of lower price and smaller screen suddenly makes the device more personal again – probably because it’s more mobile.  Microsoft will likely find success with Windows 8 RT, but it won’t be iPad-level success.  Rather, they’ll have nothing more than a viable slate alternative to a Windows desktop/laptop at best, and a larger version of a Windows Phone 8 smartphone at worst – complete with the market traction that they’ve enjoyed for the past year with Windows Phone 7.

Personally, I think that the relative success of the Kindle Fire and the Nexus 7 are harbingers of the future of consumer tablets.  Curated experiences.  Portals to the ecosystem.  Unquestionable media-consumption devices that can run mobile apps on a larger, more comfortable screen than a smartphone.  And presently, the only real contenders in this space seem to be – yes, Kindle Fire and Nexus 7.  But there’s more to the story.  Google is probably better positioned than any other company at present to lead the next tablet wave.  Why?  Simply, Amazon has no interest in tablets for tablet’s sake.  Google, with the unvieiling of the Play brand, has a competitor to Amazon and they have an app store to compete with Apple.  And… they have a slew of online resources that cater to social and productivity – the latter of which has been Microsoft’s strong suit.

They’re the only company that has a 7″ tablet, a mature media store, a mature app store, and mature cloud-based social and productivity offerings.  If they were to use the 7″ tablet as a curated experience, they could immediately offer the end-user a solution to every usage case there is for a mobile device that’s not a smartphone and doesn’t have a hardware keyboard.

Stop treating Drive/Docs, Gmail, Google+ etc. as mere apps.  They need to be integrated.  Google needs to own the experience.  Sure, a user can still run the Kindle app, but there would be an obvious and clear distinction between an “app” and the ecosystem.  Stop treating the tablet as an app launcher and start treating it as an extension of your brand.

This is something that Google could do without alienating the notion of “openness”.  Again, they’re well-positioned – they have the hardware “Nexus” brand.  Rather than have a Nexus phone and a larger Nexus phone as they do now (ie, the Google Nexus and the Nexus 7), have a Nexus phone with stock Android and a Nexus tablet with “Google Experience” – the curated experience.  And if they want to continue to pursue the 10″ space (which they should), then get serious about tablet apps.  Distinguish them in the Play store, and work with developers to take advantage of the recent app guidelines.

Google still has time to figure this out.  Word is that an iPad Mini will be released soon, but unless Apple changes the staid iOS experience then we’re really only talking about the same old iPad in a smaller form factor.  It will challenge the Kindle Fire and existing Nexus 7 simply because it’s an Apple product.  If Google were to redefine (or evolve) the 7″ tablet space then they could compete with an iPad Mini on the same basis – it would become a bonafied Google product, not just an Android tablet.

My future is (apparently) here; HP TouchPad added to the stable [updated 02/25/12]

As the title says, my WiFi network is now playing host to a 16GB HP TouchPad. And maybe it’s just my tablet newbie-ness, but I’m not getting what all the fuss is about re: thickness.

Granted, my Fujitsu pen computer (whose location is now unknown…) is probably closing in on 1-inch of girth. But looking at the TouchPad, I’m convinced that a thinner device might still be comfortable to hold but I can’t imagine that it would be any more comfortable to hold.

Now I know that HP wrote off the TouchPad hardware for a number of reasons – not just an inability to compete with iPad on the thickness front – but personally I think that the “thin-is-in” mantra is just more good marketing being thrown our way.

Anyhow, on the software front I can say that webOS isn’t as smooth as Android, and most definitely can’t hold a candle to iOS. But if you read a previous article you’ll discover what I find most alluring about webOS, performance issues aside. I’m currently in the process of adding patches to make the interface that much more snappy, and the major project at present is to enable streaming of my network video and TV shows. DLNA (or uPnP) is the name of the game here, and it’s requiring a certain amount of synergy between client and server that I haven’t quite mastered yet.

But so far I’m relatively content. More later.

[update 2011/12/16]

So I’ve had the TouchPad running for almost two months now.  And like most people’s TouchPad experiences, the road hasn’t been entirely smooth.

It all started when I tried to do the initial setup of the TouchPad while tethered to my phone’s WiFi hotspot. The tablet kept complaining that it couldn’t reach the HP servers.  Not knowing if this was an HP issue or a carrier issue or what, I didn’t think much else of it.

I had the same problem using my main WiFi network at home, but again, I figured maybe the HP servers were overloaded.

Many attempts later, I finally completed the setup.  And my main problem was spotty WiFi performance.

I posted a thread over at forums.precentral.net (now webosnation.com) detailing the problem, so you can head over if you want the juicy details (and an idea of how many other TP users have comm. issues).  The Coles Notes version: I had no problem accessing my intranet resources over WiFi, but browsing the interwebs at-large was a hit-or-miss affair.

As a result I finally settled on setting up an Apache forward proxy instance, and considering that the TP tends to “live” at home, this solution has proven acceptable.

So what’s my almost-two-months impression of the tablet?

Truthfully it’s getting the intended job done.  I have to admit that there are some usability issues related to the browser (which, in general, I knew to have some issues before ever joining the webOS camp) – most notably, accessing Hotmail requires some patience. But for the most part it’s quite enjoyable, and having Flash makes things very nice indeed.  That I’ve had no issues with Flash videos running fullscreen up to 720p – added bonus.

So I tend to use the tablet mainly for browsing, and this may involve logging into my Google account via the browser and catching up on Google Reader news.  Or I may surf Engadget.  Or CNN.  Or whatever.  It works, and it works well.

I’ve also taken to setting up a Google account specifically for family use, and this account is in fact linked to the TouchPad.  Now, you may recall some concerns I had about a house guest being able to pick up the tablet and read personal information.  But I figured… the main point of this “family” Google account is to setup a synced calendar.  This is no more private or public to a house guest than the calendar hanging on the fridge that we (attempt) to use to track events of relevance to the family.  So the privacy concerns are somewhat moot.  Add in the ability for said Google calendar to sync across the TouchPad, my phone, and Shelly’s phone – automagically – and you have an appealing organizational tool.

Granted, Shelly has asked me more than once about these calendar entries I keep inserting into her calendar… but that’s beside the point 🙂

So for web browsing and family organization, the TouchPad is useful.  Whatever about media consumption then?

I talked previously about DLNA, and I’m happy to say that the combination of bHome and TouchPlayer and PS3 Media Server results in a (mostly) enjoyable experience of viewing network-stored videos on the TouchPad.  I say “mostly”, because sometimes it takes a few finger-taps in bHome for TouchPlayer to actually start playing the video, but usually it just works.  TouchPlayer has some kinks that need to be worked out – most notable a less-than stellar scrub feature – but the ability to play my MPEG2, Windows Media Video and DivX vids on the TouchPad without real-time transcoding?  Priceless 🙂

So am I pining for an ICS port on the TouchPad?  It would be nice to play with, but from what I’ve seen of ICS, it looks a lot like the Honeycomb experience that I already pooh-pooh’d on a tablet form-factor.  Sure, the apps must be fantastically wicked awesome, but I’m quite happy with the fact that I can pick up the TouchPad, get a specific task done, then put it down without feeling obliged to interact with apps just for the sake of interacting with apps.

The web is the OG “app” my friends.  You bettah ask somebody!

[update 2012/02/25]

Just wanted to say that I’m now rocking ICS on ye olde TouchPad. O still think that WebOS wipes the floor with Google’s offering, but I just can’t deny the: polished state of ICS vs. WebOS; the mountain of apps that is Google Market.

Yes yes yes… I know that I wrote previously stating that the web is a great alternative to mobile apps. But there are just some things that a website simply can’t do (at least on a tablet) – like connect to my servers using RDP.

I still think the card metaphor of WebOS is light-years ahead of what any other tablet OS has to offer (save perhaps Blackberry’s PlayBook OS, but we all know where that got its inspiration from…). But… WebOS is struggling for developer attention, Android isn’t. And it shows, both in the available app catalog as well as in the OS itself.

It’s a shame really 😦

Tablets – ready for (my) primetime? [updated 01/27/12]

I’ve heard a yearning for a tablet for a long time.  I made a (misguided) foray into the world of pen computers, scoring a used device on eBay some number of years ago.  Suffice it to say that that particular puppy hasn’t seen the light of day in some time.

The iPad is now all the rage.  And while I understand the allure of the device, and the particular niche it fulfills, the more I look at the iPad for my intended purpose the more I’m realizing that there are way too many shortcomings to even consider dropping $600+ on the thing.  And unfortunately, the same goes for the Samsung Galaxy Tab, the current champ in the non-Apple tablet world.

Here’s the thing.  I’m not looking for a device to carry around with me.  That’s what a smartphone is for.  Which isn’t to say that I wouldn’t want to travel with the tablet; rather, it would tend to “live” mostly at home.  So I’m not particularly adverse to the 10″ form factor; weight may be an issue, but if we’re talking solely about “portability” then there’s nothing wrong with 10″.

Now, I decided a long time ago that every portable device deserves a wireless connection.  I didn’t spend long with my Compaq iPAQ 3630 before an expansion sleeve and PCMCIA WiFi card were ordered.  Fortunately, any modern computing device worth its silicon has a myriad of wireless connectivity options – one of which is “3G”.  The carriers love to push this, as more 3G-toting users means more revenue.  But again, given that my intended use for a tablet is for home use, I’m pretty sure I can get by with WiFi – and tether to my smartphone whenever truly mobile connectivity is needed.

So what of these shortcomings?  I’m getting to that.  And in order to get to that, I have to talk about the fact that these devices are actually quite capable little devices.  The Tab, in particular, feels very powerful to me.  It screams “computer” much more than the iPad, and that’s not a bad thing.  It does its job so well, in fact, that I’m chomping at the bit to cram an Android smartphone into a pant pocket.  As a mobile platform, I must say that Android is getting it done quite nicely.

The iPad, on the other hand, still comes off as a large toy.  I just can’t shake the feeling.  Sure, you can run cool apps, but I’m not looking to run cool apps at home.  My home needs for a tablet are quite modest – surf the web, control my home automation systems, check email.  It really doesn’t have to get more complex than that.

And in that vein, the Tab also falls short.  Every time I pick up a Tab I feel like I should be putting it in my pocket and carrying it around with me for the entire day.  This is not a feeling I want to get from a device that’s supposed to live on the living room table.  I think that Samsung is intending the tab to be a mobile, portable device – but that’s not the niche that I want it to fill.

Then there are more tangible shortcomings – like the complete and utter lack of multi-user support.  Some of the coolest things you can do with the iPad and Tab come from using the native apps, which are the most pure reflections of what the manufacturer intended you to use the device for.  And some apps, like email, are very personal in nature – do I want some house guest to pick up my tablet and start reading my email?

And so… I’m conflicted.  On a few fronts.  I don’t like Apple’s walled garden, but I think I do like the 10″ form factor.  I like Android’s utility, but I don’t want/need my tablet to be that powerful.  So what am I saying, really?

One, is that none of the tablets on the market now are going to get the job done for me.  I mean, I’d take either one if I won it (though I’d probably sell the iPad), but there’s no way I’m paying $600+.

Two, is that I know what I need:

  • multi-touch interface
  • capacitive touchscreen
  • tabbed browser with Flash support

I think I’d like a capable built-in media player, but I do not want to store media on the device.  Not even pictures.  Any media should be streamed over the network  – perhaps using UPnP or DLNA.  And while I’m not adverse to accessing a marketplace and running other native/3rd-party apps, I think that this capability must go hand-in-hand with the some sort of fast-user-switching ala Windows XP Home.

Until these criteria are met, I may find myself sitting on the sidelines of the tablet game.

[update 2011/08/30]

Interesting article from Engadget, questioning the tablet’s position as a productivity device and the real necessity for a “third device”.  At this point I really wish I had scored a $99 TouchPad – not quite “taking one if I won it” that I mentioned above, but close enough.  Oh well, so it goes.  I figured I could move run an Android port on it as soon as that technical feat was accomplished.  Surely it wouldn’t be long, right?  But something strange happened when I played with a TouchPad in-store for 30 minutes or so, followed by a couple of Honeycomb tablets – I was far more impressed with WebOS than Honeycomb.  In fact, Honeycomb felt like the cross between a media device and a mobile computer that I alluded to earlier in this post, to the point that the promised functionality belied the limitations of the device (reported so well in that Engadget article).  I suppose that experience reaffirmed an earlier tweet I had made that WebOS on a tablet would be killer.  It’s unfortunate that software support will be lacking though; I did note some issues with the native web browser, and it’s very questionable how timely updates would come out (if at all) to address such issues.  If a port of Honeycomb or even Gingerbread ever surfaced for TouchPad, then certainly updates would be frequent – but again, Honeycomb felt like an entirely different beast, with WebOS wearing the tablet pants much better than Honeycomb.

So it seems that not much has changed.  My requirements still remain the same – multitouch with tabbed browsing and Flash support.  If anything, I’m now more convinced of the things that I don’t want – ie, a tablet with a complex interface.  Keep It Simple Stupid.

Even the multi-user conundrum has a workable solution on WebOS.  Firstly, I imagine that the only player who will solve this problem outright is Microsoft with Windows 8.  And I already know that such a tablet will be insanely expensive and too powerful for the light duty I’d want it to perform.  Secondly, a tablet’s increased real-estate means that visiting webpages is a very practical alternative to running the dedicated app (think Facebook, Gmail, etc).  Thirdly, I’m not of the mind that – even at $99 – it makes sense for a household to have multiple tablets for the sole purpose of casual usage; quite simply, it’s an unnecessary indulgence and a real distraction.

So how is the conundrum solved?  Whether through fast-user switching (ala Windows) or actively logging in/out, the fact is that a multi-user system requires a user to reauthenticate and “unlock” the device.  Now, if you’re working on a tablet that’s little more than a casual media consumption device, I can imagine that it’s enough to do this un/lock dance on a per-“app” basis.  And the ability to login and logout is something that every website application presents as a matter of course, but no native tablet app presents as a matter of course.  Many people are probably used to doing so within their web browsers.  So right there, the “requirement” to run the web version of your “productivity” apps – and crucially, the ability to do so on a generously-sized screen – means that you don’t have to worry about somebody sticking their nose into your private data.

But here’s where WebOS shines.  If I’ve got a video open on the family tablet, or a series of webpages – neither of which are “private” – then somebody else can pick up the tablet, stack my open apps, and open their own apps and webpages.  And so you end up with a shared user space, where each user’s resources are sitting in their own stack.  When I want to use the tablet and restore the state of my “apps”, I stack all other apps and unstack mine.  And finally, since we’re talking about a simple tablet here, I can imagine that each stack would only be a handful of cards deep – ie, very manageable for both user and system.  I certainly wouldn’t have 10-15 apps open simultaneously like I tend to do on a desktop computer.

I’ll say it – it’s unfortunate that TouchPad went from overpriced at $500 to unsupported at $100.  A happy medium may very well have been $150-200.  Here’s to hoping that WebOs lives on and that somebody picks up the hardware mantle.  Certainly everybody has seen that there’s demand for a non-iPad tablet at a lower price point?  It doesn’t have to compete with iPad; rather it just needs to fill the niche that the $99 fire-sale flushed out.

[update 2012/01/27]

Well well well

That may change things.